US News

Goodbye Gulf of Mexico: Donald Trump wants to rename the body of water Gulf of America

The President-elect is proposing a new name for the Gulf of Mexico as he prepares to enter the White House later this month.

The President-elect is proposing a new name for the Gulf of Mexico as he prepares to enter the White House later this month.
Carlos Barria
Maite Knorr-Evans
Maite joined the AS USA in 2021, bringing her experience as a research analyst investigating illegal logging to the team. Maite’s interest in politics propelled her to pursue a degree in international relations and a master's in political philosophy. At AS USA, Maite combines her knowledge of political economy and personal finance to empower readers by providing answers to their most pressing questions.
Update:

President-elect Donald Trump has announced that tarrifs will be imposed on imported goods from Mexico on Day 1 of his administration, with the proposed tax rate to hit consumers and business floated standing at 25 percent.

Now with less than a month until inauguration day, the president-elect is taking another jab at the country’s southern neighbor, proposing a switch in the name from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

Does the name change really matter?

Unlike the other economic and military threats the president-elect has made, the change of the name is more asthetic than anything.

The Mexican government and public are likely to take offense at the symbolic change by Donald Trump, but such a name change would not have a significant impact on the daily lives of Mexican citizens. The proposal appears to be another flex of power by the incoming administration. During comments made on Tuesday by the president-elect he noted that the name would cover “a lot of territory,” perhaps hoping that other “American” countries would support such a change.

However, the change would not affect international laws governing maritime boundaries or the distribution of ocean territory under the jurisdiction of either country. Mexico’s government could choose to ignore the move, as adopting the new name would be entirely voluntary unless enforced through a binding international initiative, such as one passed by the United Nations Security Council.

Related stories

The U.S., under its new UN Ambassador, former New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, could attempt to rally support among member states for the name change. However, such an effort would likely waste political capital at a time when U.S. hegemonic influence depends heavily on the backing of European allies. These governments are unlikely to see their interests aligned with supporting such a symbolic and divisive gesture.

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

Tagged in:
Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

We recommend these for you in Latest news