Los 40 USA
Sign in to commentAPP
spainSPAINchileCHILEcolombiaCOLOMBIAusaUSAmexicoMEXICOlatin usaLATIN USAamericaAMERICA

POLITICS

Haitian group in Springfield files charges against Trump and Vance: what punishment could they face?

These comments, which local officials and fact-checkers have stated are baseless, have allegedly led to significant threats against Haitians.

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump and Republican U.S. vice presidential nominee Senator JD Vance attend a ceremony marking the 23rd anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., September 11, 2024. REUTERS/Kent J. Edwards
Kent J. EdwardsREUTERS

A Haitian community group named Haitian Bridge Alliance has filed charges against former President Donald Trump and his running mate Senator J.D. Vance, alleging discrimination and incitement. While the legal merits of the case remain uncertain, it raises questions about potential consequences the pair could face if found guilty.

The charges stem from the statements made by Trump and Vance regarding the Haitian community in the US, specifically in Springfield, Ohio.

Trump claimed during a presidential debate with Vice President Kamala Harris: “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs... The newcomers are eating the cats. They are consuming the pets of the locals. This is happening in our nation, and it is disgraceful.”

For his part, Vance shared a rumor that pets belonging to Springfield residents had been “taken and consumed by individuals who do not belong in this country.”

It is virtually impossible that the case will be resolved before the November election. The judge, who was served the affadavit, has not yet confirmed whether the charges will be heard in court.

Potential legal consequences for the Republican pair

If the case proceeds and results in convictions, the penalties Trump and Vance could face would depend on the exact nature of the charges:

If found guilty of violating anti-discrimination laws, penalties could include fines and injunctive relief requiring changes in behavior or policies. Criminal discrimination charges are rare but could theoretically carry jail time.

Proving criminal incitement is notoriously difficult due to First Amendment protections. If convicted, penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, though the latter is unlikely for first-time offenders in non-violent cases.

However, like many of Trump’s other cases it is not known how the Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s criminal liability will affect a potential case. Any conviction would likely face immediate appeal, delaying punishment if found guilty.

Rules