What is the leaked “Project 25″ for Donald Trump’s possible second term?
The conservative political effort incorporates a plan for the early days of a Republican administration, aiming to secure a victory in the long term.
Project 2025 is a conservative endeavor to prepare the groundwork for a second Trump administration. The leaders of Project 2025 had emphasized that the effort was launched before the GOP primaries began and that it is not an extension of Donald Trump’s campaign. Additionally, they encourage Democrats to consider their proposal and “reform” them in the same way Republicans could if elected in November.
The motivation behind the project is to ensure that any Republican administration can efficiently begin implementing conservative policies as soon as 20 January 2025. Project 2025 is also flexible. One of the main Republican critiques of the Trump administration’s tenure was that they were slow to get political appointees and administration officials in place and thus lost time when they could have used their new power to enact conservative policies. If Donald Trump doesn’t win in November, they can start planning for Project 2029 to guide a Republican administration should they win in the next general election cycle.
Organized by the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 brings together over 100 right-wing political organizations, including the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which has been known to draft laws proposed by conservative lawmakers. Other members include the Claremont Institute, Moms for Liberty, and Turning Point USA, not to mention organizations like the Alliance Defending Freedom and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, which see Project 2025 as a vehicle to bring a Christian nationalist vision to Washington.
The mandate put together by the organizations involved is available to be read online for those who want to form their own opinion of Project 2025.
What is the stated goal of Project 2025?
“The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025,” reads the Project 2025 website. The project is described as an attempt to “rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left” which will require “we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place.”
The organization has begun publishing a “playbook” with policies it would encourage the administration to adopt and is collecting resumes to ensure that the White House could place the “right” candidate on the vacant rolls if the Democrats lose. This would mean a reform of the civil service where the president can replace workers with their allies.
The first line of the section on the Department of Education reads: “Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.” For many conservative political leaders, the structure of education should be up to the states, with the federal government restricted in its ability to make mandates over curriculum.
For Democrats and Progressives, Project 2025 is a nightmare and highlights how dangerous an effective far-right administration could be if the right people are leading the way. Critics argue that the policies included would blur the lines between Church and State by enacting policies centered around the Christian faith.
In the section on the Department of Labor, the author who served there during the Trump administration as the Acting / Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Jonathan Berry, notes that “the Judeo-Christian tradition, stretching back to Genesis, has always recognized fruitful work as integral to human dignity, as service to God, neighbor, and family.” The document attacks Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives that the Department of Labor has led during the Obama and Biden administrations and calls on Congress to prohibit funding programs that incorporate another right-wing boogy man, ‘critical race theory.’