What is the NBA challenge rule and why doesn’t LeBron James like it?
The NBA’s challenge rule drew the ire of the Lakers star, but he may have a point following a strange scenario in the Mavs’ win over the Timberwolves.
Though it’s clear that the NBA’s introduction of the challenge rule has brought a greater degree of integrity to the game i.e., refereeing decisions can be overturned, it stands to reason that there is work that still needs to be done regarding how the rule functions going forward.
LeBron James is not a fan of the NBA’s challenge rule
While the Dallas Mavericks will be pleased with themselves, following a 108-105 vs the Minnesota Timberwolves in Game 1 of the Western Conference finals, they will likely not be happy with the situation they found themselves in during the fourth quarter. Indeed, head coach Jason Kidd used both of the team’s allotted challenges and was successful in doing so, however, due to the NBA’s rules Kidd and Co. went into the final quarter of the game without any challenges remaining.
That’s where Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James entered the fray as it was apparently too much to take. “Have to change that challenge rule!” James said on social media. “No way you have 2 successful challenges and can’t anymore for the rest of the game! Makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.” For the purpose of context, Kidd’s second challenge was used on an out-of-bounds call that was initially ruled as a jump ball midway through the third quarter. Though successful, the risk was clear. Ultimately, the Mavs as mentioned above were able to get the win meaning they now lead 1-0, but the idea that the team had no challenges remaining despite being successful in its challenges doesn’t seem right.
To be clear, the challenge rule itself was only implemented in 2019. At that time, teams were only permitted a single challenge per game, but as of this season, that has been increased to two on the condition that the first one is successful. Logically, if an additional challenge is awarded on the grounds that a team’s first is successful, should it not be the case that another is granted if the same requirement is met once again? Understandably, awarding an additional challenge each time one is successful could in theory lead to multiple stoppages, something that the league likely wants to avoid. On the other hand, it places pressure on referees to be more accurate in their calls, which is a good thing, right? Truthfully, this is a conversation that’s only going to intensify i.e., sooner or later the NBA will have to answer to the challenge.