Editions
Los 40 USA
Scores
Follow us on
Hello
Technology

The first 3D printed bridge in history and the controversy that saw its end

It was a bridge too far as while the world’s first 3D-printed bridge was a groundbreaking achievement, not everyone was impressed.

Impresora 3D primer puente construido fracaso Ámsterdam
Update:

Innovations are not always met with universal praise. Even when they push boundaries and revolutionize industries, there will always be those who resist change. That was the case in Amsterdam, a city famous for its canals, where in 2021, the world’s first fully 3D-printed bridge was unveiled.

For some, it was a remarkable technological achievement. For others, it was a visual blight on the cityscape.

Why was the 3D bridge a problem?

Despite the engineering feat, many locals were unhappy with the bridge’s design, claiming it looked too modern and clashed with the classic architecture of Amsterdam’s Red Light District. The structure was initially installed at Oudezijds Achterburgwal with a temporary permit, serving as a replacement for an aging bridge undergoing renovation.

However, following relentless criticism, the 3D-printed bridge was removed in 2023. In the end, the original, centuries-old bridge was restored, erasing what could have been a symbol of cutting-edge urban design.

The first 3D printed bridge in history and the controversy that saw its end
Amsterdam, 3D printed bridge

Was the bridge actually safe?

The first question on many people’s minds: Was the bridge structurally sound?

Some skeptics may have imagined it as a flimsy, plastic-like structure, reminiscent of home-use 3D printers that produce resin or filament-based objects. The reality, however, was far different.

The project, led by MX3D, took six years to complete, utilizing stainless steel bearings and robotic arms to shape the structure using advanced modeling software. The bridge was built with 4,500 kg (9,920 lbs) of stainless steel, making it just as durable and secure as any traditional metal bridge.

There was never a question of physical safety – but aesthetic safety? That was another story.

An engineering triumph, a visual failure

Ugly? Absolutely.

While the bridge was a testament to innovation, it simply didn’t fit the city’s historic aesthetic. Despite its technological significance, the backlash proved that sometimes, tradition wins over progress.

Related stories

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.

Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

Tagged in:

Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

Your opinion will be published with first and last names

We recommend these for you in Latest news