Editions
Los 40 USA
Scores
Follow us on
Hello
Fraud

Denver woman recovers $7,363 after bank account robbery despite bank’s refusal to help

Despite being alerted of suspicious activity on her SoFi savings account, Megan Holt was told 19 unauthorized transactions appeared legitimate.

El dólar estadounidense logra estabilizarse tras semanas a la baja. Conoce el precio de la moneda hoy, martes 24 de septiembre, en México y parte de Centroamérica.
Jose Luis Gonzalez
Roddy Cons
Scottish sports journalist and content creator. After running his own soccer-related projects, in 2022 he joined Diario AS, where he mainly reports on the biggest news from around Europe’s leading soccer clubs, Liga MX and MLS, and covers live games in a not-too-serious tone. Likes to mix things up by dipping into the world of American sports.
Update:

Opening up your bank app, or checking your balance at an ATM, and discovering your account has been mysteriously drained of a huge amount of money is many people’s worst nightmare.

But that’s exactly what happened to Megan Holt, who had to fight with SoFi to avoid losing nearly $7,400 overnight.

Bank rules transactions legitimate, no sign of hacking

When the Denver resident opened a high-yield savings account with the online personal finance company, she decided to use it for that purpose only. However, one day she woke up to 19 outgoing transactions, friend-to-friend transfers between $100 and $900, amounting to a total of $7,363.

SoFi itself called Holt to discuss what it saw as suspicious activity, which she denied authorizing. Logically, the account owner then assumed the bank would protect her, but was horrified to discover that wasn’t the case.

Following an investigation, SoFi concluded the transactions were legitimate and there had been no clear sign her account had been hacked, despite its initial doubt.

EFTA to the rescue after unauthorized transactions

Luckily for persistent Holt, she got in touch with the federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA), which opened a case against SoFi, eventually leading to her getting her money back.

Speaking to 9News, Denver-based consumer protection attorney Dan Vedra explained what consumers' rights are when something like this happens: “The law says that the consumer is not liable for unauthorized electronic funds transfers. The financial institution is liable for an unauthorized electronic funds transfer”.

Verda believes the sheer number of unauthorized transactions that take place each day means some cases, like Holt’s, get overlooked, which is where the EFTA comes in when banks refuse to help.

However, it should be noted there is a strict 60-day window to dispute fraudulent charges. If the fraud is reported to the EFTA within two business days, the consumer is usually only liable for up to $50 of stolen funds, which rises to $500 if reported between three and 60 days. Once that window has passed, though, banks aren’t required to return stolen money.

Related stories

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.

Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

Tagged in:

Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

Your opinion will be published with first and last names

We recommend these for you in Latest news