NewslettersSign inAPP
spainSPAINargentinaARGENTINAchileCHILEcolombiaCOLOMBIAusaUSAmexicoMEXICOperuPERUlatin usaLATIN USAamericaAMERICA

POLITICS

Will Steve Bannon go to jail after being found guilty on contempt of Congress charges?

After fewer that three hours of deliberations, Donald Trump’s close associate has been convicted, with some calling it politically motivated.

Update:
Former President Trump's political advisor has been indicted by the Justice Department for failing to comply with a subpoena for information relating to 6 January.

“All hell is going to break loose tomorrow.” Those were the words uttered by Steve Bannon on 5 January 2021 and on Friday we heard the news that the close associate and advisor of former President Donald Trump had been convicted of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the 6 January committee. Now many are asking whether or not this conviction will see the poster boy for the American right wing spend time behind bars

When will Steve Bannon be sentenced?

The aforementioned committee have been probing last year’s attack on the U.S. Capitol, which took place on 6 January 2021 and the panel called the verdict a “victory for the rule of law.” The 68-year old was found guilty by a jury of two misdemeanor counts for refusing to provide testimony or documents to the House of Representatives select committee as it aims to lay out all the evidence that points to Trump and his supporters attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Each count is punishable by 30 days to one year behind bars and a fine of $100 to $100,000. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols set a 21 October sentencing date. The verdict by the jury of eight men and four women, after less than three hours of deliberations, marked the first successful prosecution for contempt of Congress since 1974, when a judge found G. Gordon Liddy, a conspirator in the Watergate scandal that prompted President Richard Nixon’s resignation, guilty.

“We lost a battle here today. We’re at war”

Steve Bannon after verdict

Bannon was a key adviser to the Republican Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, then served as his chief White House strategist during 2017 before a falling out between them that was later patched up. Bannon also has played an instrumental role in right-wing media.

“We lost a battle here today. We’re at war,” Bannon told reporters after the verdict, and castigated the “members of that show-trial committee” who he said “didn’t have the guts to come down here and testify in open court.” Bannon opted not to testify in his own defense.

“No one is above the law” - Cheney reacts to Bannon conviction

“The conviction of Steve Bannon is a victory for the rule of law,” Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Democrat, and Vice Chair Liz Cheney, a Republican, said in a statement. ”Just as there must be accountability for all those responsible for the events of January 6th, anyone who obstructs our investigation into these matters should face consequences. No one is above the law,” they added.

Bannon's defense team in closing arguments on Friday suggested that Bannon was a political target and painted the main prosecution witness as a politically motivated Democrat with ties to one of the prosecutors, including belonging to the same book club. The prosecution said Bannon showed disdain for the authority of Congress and needed to be held accountable for unlawful defiance.

Prosecutor Molly Gaston told jurors the attack represented a "dark day" for America, adding: "There is nothing political about finding out why Jan. 6 happened and making sure it never happens again."

Will Steve Bannon appeal the verdict?

There was little doubt that Bannon’s legal team would be getting more hours clocked up with an appeal and after the verdict, David Schoen, one of his attorneys, promised his client will have “a bullet-proof appeal.”

The judge limited the scope of the case Bannon's team could present. Bannon was barred from arguing that he believed his communications with Trump were subject to a legal doctrine called executive privilege that can keep certain presidential communications confidential and was prohibited from arguing he relied upon an attorney's legal advice in refusing to comply.

In two days of testimony, prosecutors questioned only two witnesses and the defense called none.

Trump at the center of 6 January hearings

The conviction may strengthen the committee’s position as it seeks testimony and documents from others in Trump’s orbit. Trump last year asked his associates not to cooperate, accusing the committee of trying to hurt him politically. Several rebuffed the panel. Another former Trump adviser, Peter Navarro, was charged with contempt of Congress in June for refusing a committee deposition. Navarro’s trial is scheduled for November.

The Justice Department opted not to charge Trump associates Mark Meadows and Daniel Scavino for defying the committee despite a House vote recommending it. The main prosecution witness was Kristin Amerling, a top committee staffer who testified that Bannon spurned deadlines to respond to last September’s subpoena, sought no extensions and offered an invalid rationale for his defiance: Trump’s claim of executive privilege.

The Justice Department charged Bannon last November after the Democratic-led House voted the prior month to hold him in contempt. Bannon separately was charged in 2020 with defrauding donors to a private fund-raising effort to boost Trump's project to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border. Trump pardoned Bannon before that case went to trial.

A pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol and attacked police with batons, sledgehammers, flag poles, Taser devices, chemical irritants, metal pipes, rocks, metal guard rails and other weapons in a failed effort to block congressional certification of his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. According to the committee, Bannon spoke with Trump at least twice on the day before the attack, attended a planning meeting at a Washington hotel and said on his right-wing podcast “all hell is going to break loose tomorrow.”

Bannon’s defense argued he believed the subpoena deadlines were flexible and subject to negotiation. In an 11th-hour reversal with the trial looming, Bannon this month announced a willingness to testify in a public committee hearing, an offer prosecutors said did not change the fact he had already broken the law.