FIFA transgender rules explained: Why the 2031 Women’s World Cup could face a new debate

FIFA informed the United States this week that it is set to host the 2031 FIFA Women’s World Cup, though the bid still requires formal approval through FIFA’s host selection process later this year.

The Trump administration has signaled that transgender athlete eligibility could become part of negotiations surrounding the 2031 FIFA Women’s World Cup, with U.S. officials pushing FIFA to align with the administration’s policies on transgender participation in women’s sports.

Why wasn’t transgender policy a major issue at the 2026 Men’s World Cup?

The 2026 Men’s World Cup is currently being hosted in the United States, with the final set to kick off this Sunday. However, the transgender topic was not one of debate heading into this tournament. The men’s World Cup is already an open category. There is no separate “men’s protection” debate comparable to the discussions surrounding women’s competitions, where eligibility rules exist specifically because of average physical differences between male and female athletes.

The 2026 World Cup hosting process was also completed years ago. The United States, Mexico, and Canada were awarded the tournament in 2018, long before transgender participation in sports became one of the most prominent political issues in American sports.

By contrast, the United States-led bid for the 2031 Women’s World Cup is still moving through FIFA’s hosting process. FIFA has not formally awarded the tournament yet, meaning government guarantees and hosting agreements remain part of the discussion.

What are FIFA’s current transgender eligibility rules?

FIFA does not currently have a blanket rule banning transgender women from women’s competitions. The organization’s existing framework relies on national associations to verify player eligibility rather than requiring universal testing at FIFA tournaments.

FIFA has historically avoided mandatory routine sex verification testing, instead leaving eligibility decisions to member associations while maintaining the ability to investigate individual cases. That approach is different from some other major sports organizations, which have introduced stricter rules.

How other sports have handled transgender eligibility

There is no single global standard across sports. Different international governing bodies have taken different approaches based on their own research, competition structures and priorities.

The International Olympic Committee changed direction in recent years by giving individual sports federations more authority over eligibility rules, and later adopted a policy restricting transgender women from competing in women’s Olympic events while requiring eligibility screening.

Track and field has moved toward stricter restrictions. World Athletics does not allow transgender women who have experienced male puberty to compete in women’s international events under its current regulations.

Swimming has taken a similar approach. World Aquatics created restrictions for transgender women who experienced male puberty, while also exploring alternative competition categories.

Soccer, however, has remained more cautious. Football’s global governing bodies operate across hundreds of countries with very different laws and cultural views, making a single worldwide policy more complicated.

Why is the United States focused on this issue?

The debate has become especially prominent in the U.S. because transgender participation in sports has become part of a much larger political discussion. The Trump administration has made restricting transgender participation in women’s sports a major policy priority, including executive actions aimed at preventing transgender women from competing in women’s categories.

In many other countries, similar debates exist, but they have generally remained more focused within sports organizations rather than becoming a major national political issue. The United States also has a unique relationship with women’s sports because of Title IX, the 1972 law that dramatically expanded opportunities for women and girls in athletics. Questions about fairness, access and protection of women’s competitions often receive greater attention in American sports culture.

Could FIFA change its rules before the 2031 Women’s World Cup?

FIFA has not announced plans to change its transgender eligibility framework, and any future policy would need to balance several competing factors:

• Host-country laws and requirements
• FIFA’s own regulations
• International differences in gender policy
• Athlete inclusion and competitive fairness

The governing body has faced similar challenges before when hosting tournaments in countries with different social and political environments. The challenge for FIFA will be finding a policy that can operate across a global sport while navigating increasingly different views among its member nations. The debate is not about to disappear. And unlike the 2026 men’s tournament, this time it is becoming part of the World Cup story before the first whistle is even blown.

Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.