Editions
Los 40 USA
Scores
Follow us on
Hello

Manchester City

Man City case overturned: Full CAS ruling as UEFA reply

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) overturned the initial two year UEFA ban against Premier League side Manchester City on Monday.

Manchester City (United Kingdom).- (FILE) - A general view of the Etihad stadium before the English Premier League match between Manchester City and Chelsea in Manchester, Britain, 23 November 2019 (reissued 13 July 2020). The international Court of Arbit
JON SUPEREFE

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) confirmed their decision on Manchester City's appeal against their Champions League ban on Monday and ruled in favour of the Premier League side who can now participate in the 2020/21 Champions League competition.

Full CAS statement

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the arbitration procedure between Manchester City Football Club and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA).

Following the hearing, the CAS Panel deliberated and concluded that the decision issued on 14 February 2020 by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB should be set aside and replaced by the following: a.) MCFC has contravened Article 56 of the Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations. b.) MCFC shall pay a fine of EUR 10,000,000 to UEFA, within 30 days as from the date of issuance of the arbitral award.

The CAS award emphasized that most of the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred. As the charges with respect to any dishonest concealment of equity funding were clearly more significant violations than obstructing the CFCB’s investigations, it was not appropriate to impose a ban on participating in UEFA’s club competitions for MCFC’s failure to cooperate with the CFCB’s investigations alone.

However, considering i) the financial resources of MCFC; ii) the importance of the cooperation of clubs in investigations conducted by the CFCB, because of its limited investigative means; and iii) MCFC’s disregard of such principle and its obstruction of the investigations, the CAS Panel found that a significant fine should be imposed on MCFC and considered it appropriate to reduce UEFA’s initial fine by 2/3, i.e. to the amount of EUR 10 million.

UEFA reply

Shortly after the decision was made public, the European footballing governing body issued a brief statement adding that they would be making no further comments on the matter.

UEFA takes note of the decision taken by the Court of Arbitration for Sport to reduce the sanction imposed onManchester CityFC by UEFA’s independent Club Financial Control Body for alleged breaches of the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play regulations.

UEFA notes that the CAS panel found that there was insufficient conclusive evidence to uphold all of the CFCB’s conclusions in this specific case and that many of the alleged breaches were time-barred due to the 5 year time period foreseen in the UEFA regulations.

Over the last few years, Financial Fair Play has played a significant role in protecting clubs and helping them become financially sustainable and UEFA and ECA remain committed to its principles.

UEFA will be making no further comments on the matter.