How Clinton, Bush and Obama deported millions of illegal immigrants without the fear tactics

Before Donald Trump made mass deportations an ICY political rallying cry, three of his predecessors had already expelled millions of people from the United States, quietly, bureaucratically, and often without fanfare. Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all presided over enormous enforcement systems that removed or “returned” more than 25 million people combined. The difference was tone and target: these were administrative processes, not fear-based spectacles. But which get the bigger headlines to make certain types’ blood boil?

Clinton and Bush: deterrence at the border

In the 1990s, Clinton pushed through immigration laws that hardened penalties for illegal entry and expanded cooperation with local police. His administration carried out more than 12 million removals and “voluntary returns,” mostly at the southern border. Bush inherited that framework and turbo-charged it after 9/11, folding immigration enforcement into the new Department of Homeland Security and launching the Secure Communities and Consequence Delivery systems.

By 2008, there were nearly 360,000 formal removals a year, with far more people turned back before ever seeing an immigration judge.

Obama: fewer removals, deeper consequences

Obama inherited the same machinery, and was branded “deporter in chief” for using it. But his approach shifted emphasis from sheer volume to legal permanence. Under his watch, “returns” at the border fell dramatically while formal removals surged, leaving a legal mark that discouraged re-entry. His administration also narrowed priorities: focusing on recent arrivals and those with serious criminal records.

By 2016, 85 per cent of all removals involved people caught shortly after crossing, and more than 90 per cent of interior deportations involved felony convictions.

Trump: high-profile public fear

The difference with Trump’s later policies was never just arithmetic, it was psychological. Obama’s DHS published its priorities and rarely staged media-friendly raids. Trump, by contrast, used rhetoric of invasion and chaos, promising to “remove them all.”

Yet government data through 2018 show fewer interior deportations under Trump’s early years than during Obama’s first term. Analysts at the Migration Policy Institute and Cato Institute both note that enforcement capacity – courts, detention beds, repatriation logistics – sets the real limits, not presidential bravado.

With Trump’s second term in full flow, and ICE making headlines while scaring true Americans going about their day-to-day, future numbers will show if it makes a significant difference to the quieter approach of those that went before him. Early examination gave little evidence that actual immigration arrests and removals had increased over the latter part of the Biden administration.

But while neighbors are turned into enemies, will the facts even matter with so much noise and partisanship?

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.

Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.