Immanuel Kant, philosopher: “If you punish a child for being naughty and reward them for being good, they will do the right thing merely for the sake of the reward”
Back in the 18th century, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant flagged the flaw in the positive-reinforcement approach to child-rearing.
One of the most common trends in modern child‑rearing - both at home and in early education - is learning through rewards, or positive reinforcement. When a child does something right, that behavior is rewarded: for example, the youngster may be given a special treats they wouldn’t normally get. When they misbehave, on the other hand, that reinforcement is withheld or they may even be punished.
The flaw in positive reinforcement, according to Kant
While this approach might feel thoroughly contemporary, Immanuel Kant was already talking about it some 250 years ago. “If you punish a child for being naughty and reward them for being good, they will do the right thing merely for the sake of the reward,” he argued, neatly summarizing his critique of what he called heteronomous morality.
The German philosopher, like many of his predecessors, spent much of his life reflecting on morality and law. He introduced two concepts that defined his intellectual legacy: the Hypothetical Imperative and the Categorical Imperative. The former maps directly onto positive reinforcement: “If you want X, do Y.”
The latter, by contrast, defends a far more demanding moral stance. “Do the right thing because it is the right thing to do” - no conditions attached. Act purely out of reason, simply because it is right. The logic is straightforward: in this way, people will behave as they are expected to behave. Under the alternative model, they will only do so when a reward is on the table - a reward that can never fully disappear if we want positive behavior to continue.
When children are raised according to the principles of the Hypothetical Imperative, the result is not people with “good hearts”, but rather “good negotiators”, individuals who act primarily in pursuit of their own gratification. For Kant, the real challenge was awakening the moral conscience of young people - teaching them to do good for no other reason than that doing good is, in itself, the right thing to do.
Related stories
Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.
And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.