NBA’s new anti-tanking rules could reshape the league - Here’s which teams will feel it most
From the Pistons to the Jazz to the Wizards, rebuilding in the NBA just got a lot more complicated with the league’s new anti-tanking rules.
The NBA has spent years trying to eliminate tanking. Now, it’s taking its most aggressive swing yet, and the ripple effects could fundamentally reshape how teams like the Detroit Pistons, Utah Jazz, and Washington Wizards build their futures.
With the league approving a sweeping overhaul of the draft lottery, dubbed the “3-2-1” system, the long-standing incentive to bottom out has been dramatically reduced. The worst teams in the league will no longer have the clearest path to landing a franchise-altering No. 1 pick. And for rebuilding franchises, that changes everything.
What actually changed?
The new system flattens lottery odds more than ever before and expands the field from 14 to 16 teams. Here are the main points:
- The three worst teams now receive just two lottery balls each
- Teams in the middle of the lottery (roughly 4th–10th worst) receive three balls
- Play-in teams (9th and 10th seeds) also receive two balls
- The losers of the 7–8 play-in games get one ball
Most notably, the odds of the worst teams landing the No. 1 pick have dropped from about 14% to just 5.4%. In other words, being terrible is no longer the best strategy.
Why the NBA is targeting teams like the Pistons and Wizards
No franchises better represent the old tanking model than the Detroit Pistons and Washington Wizards, teams that have spent recent seasons near the bottom of the standings in pursuit of elite draft talent.
The Wizards, for example, just landed the No. 1 overall pick in the 2026 draft. Under the new system, a team in that position would face new restrictions. They can’t win the No. 1 pick in consecutive years, and they risk limitations on repeated top-five selections. That means even if Washington remains one of the league’s worst teams, the reward for doing so is significantly diminished.
Detroit faces a similar issue. After multiple years in the lottery, the Pistons’ path to stacking high-end talent through repeated top picks becomes much narrower under the new rules.
The Utah Jazz problem: rebuilding the “right” way might not matter
The Utah Jazz present a different, and perhaps more troubling, case. Utah has been strategically rebuilding, accumulating young talent and draft assets while remaining competitive in some stretches. That approach paid off recently with a jump to the No. 2 pick in 2026.
But under the new rules, the Jazz would be blocked from landing another top-five pick in the short term. Even picks they’ve traded could be affected by these restrictions. A team doing everything “right” in a rebuild could still be capped in how much elite talent they can acquire.
So are the new rules punishing smart rebuilding along with tanking?
The middle-class teams that suddenly win
While bottom-feeders lose leverage, teams stuck in the middle could benefit. Franchises like the Chicago Bulls, Atlanta Hawks, or even the Houston Rockets, teams that often hover around the play-in range, now have comparable (or better) odds than the worst teams, and thus a reason to keep competing instead of bottoming out.
Under the new system, finishing 8th–12th in the conference may be more valuable than finishing last. That’s a seismic shift in incentives.
Why the Thunder and Spurs are uniquely positioned
Ironically, the teams best positioned to exploit the new system may already be contenders. The Oklahoma City Thunder and San Antonio Spurs, both loaded with future draft picks, benefit from a world where more teams are in the lottery (16 instead of 14) and mid-tier picks become more valuable.
Because they own picks from other teams, they don’t need those teams to be the absolute worst anymore, just bad enough to land in the expanded lottery. It’s a system that rewards long-term asset accumulation over outright losing.
The unintended play-in consequence
One of the strangest wrinkles in the new system is how it affects the play-in tournament. Teams that finish 9th or 10th still receive lottery balls, and even the losers of the 7–8 games get one. That creates a gray area where chasing the playoffs could hurt draft position and missing the playoffs narrowly could actually help. The NBA wanted to discourage tanking, but it may have created new strategic dilemmas in the middle of the standings.
The logic behind the NBA’s anti-tanking policy
By reducing the reward for losing and redistributing lottery value toward the middle, the league is betting that more teams will compete deeper into the season, fewer franchises will fully bottom out, and rebuilds will look less extreme and more gradual.
But as teams like the Pistons, Wizards, and Jazz adjust to this new reality, it’s clear that the traditional blueprint for rebuilding in the NBA has been fundamentally altered, and no one is entirely sure what replaces it.
Related stories
Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.
And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.