Rosalind Franklin, chemist: “Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated”

Rosalind Franklin was one of the most important scientists behind one of the greatest discoveries in modern biology: the structure of DNA. A physical chemist and expert in X-ray diffraction, she was involved in the production of the images that revealed DNA’s helical shape, most famously the photograph known as “Photo 51.”

Proof of DNA’s structure

That work provided crucial evidence used by James Watson and Francis Crick in building their double-helix model in 1953. Franklin’s contribution was not fully recognized at the time, and she died in 1958 at the age of 37, four years before the Nobel Prize was awarded for the discovery.

Her scientific career extended beyond DNA. She carried out pioneering research into the structure of coal and carbon, and later into viruses, producing detailed work that helped explain how viral structures are organized. But it is her role in uncovering the architecture of DNA that has cemented her place in scientific history, even if recognition came largely after her death.

Franklin’s view of science

Franklin’s view of science itself was as precise and grounded as her work. In a letter to her father, Ellis Franklin, she wrote: “Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated. Science, for me, gives a partial explanation of life. In so far as it goes, it is based on fact, experience, and experiment…” It is a statement that reflects both her rigor and her restraint. Science, in her view, was powerful, but not absolute.

The rest of that passage reveals a deeper tension. Her father held religious beliefs, including faith in life after death. Franklin did not. Instead, she offered a different kind of faith, one rooted not in the metaphysical but in human effort and progress: “In my view, all that is necessary for faith is the belief that by doing our best we shall come nearer to success… and that success in our aims (the improvement of the lot of mankind, present and future) is worth attaining.”

That distinction is key. Franklin did not reject the idea of faith altogether, but she redefined it. For her, faith was not belief without evidence, but belief in purpose, in the value of work, discovery, and human advancement. It is a position that sits between two worlds: not religious, but not blindly scientistic either.

Her quote about science and everyday life captures that balance. Science is not separate from life, she argued, but it also does not explain everything. It must be lived alongside experience, values and human judgment. In an age that often pits science against belief, Franklin’s perspective feels notably modern: rigorous, but grounded; skeptical, but purposeful.

More than half a century after her death, her words still resonate, not just as a reflection on science, but as a philosophy of how to live with it.

Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.