NBA

NBA fans are stunned: Luka dominates scoring race, gets almost no MVP love

Despite leading the league in scoring, Luka Doncic was nearly absent from the top of MVP ballots, raising questions about how value is really judged.

Despite leading the league in scoring, Luka Doncic was nearly absent from the top of MVP ballots, raising questions about how value is really judged.
ALLEN BEREZOVSKY
Jennifer Bubel
Sports Journalist, AS USA
Sports journalist who grew up in Dallas, TX. Lover of all things sports, she got her degree from Texas Tech University (Wreck ‘em Tech!) in 2011. Joined Diario AS USA in 2021 and now covers mostly American sports (primarily NFL, NBA, and MLB) as well as soccer from around the world.
Update:

There’s a long-standing belief around the NBA thaht if you lead the league in scoring, you’re almost guaranteed to be in the MVP conversation. This season, Luka Doncic put that idea to the test, and the results were surprising.

Doncic finished the year averaging a league-best 33.5 points per game, an elite mark that typically places a player easily in the MVP race. But when the votes were revealed, his name was barely near the top of the ballot.

He received no first-place votes and just one second-place vote, a disconnect that immediately stood out across the league.

Why Luka wasn’t in the MVP conversation despite league-led scoring

On paper, Doncic’s case seemed undeniable. Historically, players who dominate offensively at that level tend to command serious MVP consideration, especially when paired with playmaking and overall usage, areas where Doncic also thrives. But MVP voting has evolved.

It’s no longer just about who puts up the biggest numbers. Team success, efficiency, narrative momentum and even voter fatigue all play a role. In Doncic’s case, those factors may have worked against him despite his scoring dominance.

The team success factor

One of the biggest drivers of MVP voting is winning. Voters have consistently leaned toward players whose teams finish near the top of the standings. If a player’s team underperforms relative to expectations, or simply doesn’t separate themselves in a crowded conference, it can diminish even historic individual production.

While Doncic’s numbers were eye-popping, the overall perception of his team’s season likely didn’t match the typical profile of an MVP frontrunner.

Voter priorities are shifting

There’s also been a noticeable change in how voters define “value.” Efficiency metrics, two-way impact, and team context are now weighed more heavily than raw scoring totals. A 33.5 PPG season is still rare, but it doesn’t automatically outweigh contributions in defense, advanced analytics or team dominance.

A decade ago, leading the league in scoring might have been enough to secure multiple first-place votes. Today, it’s just one piece of a much larger evaluation.

Narrative matters more than ever

Fair or not, MVP voting is also driven by storylines. Breakout seasons, unexpected team success or players elevating franchises beyond projections often capture voter attention. Meanwhile, sustained excellence, especially from already established stars, can sometimes blend into the background.

Doncic may be a victim of that dynamic. When greatness becomes expected, it can lose some of its narrative impact, even when the numbers reach another level.

Luka vs. Shai: Why voters leaned the other way

The contrast becomes clearer when you look at the player who actually took home the award: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. While Doncic led the league in scoring, Gilgeous-Alexander delivered a more balanced profile that aligned with how MVP voters have been trending in recent years.

Shai combined elite scoring of his own with strong efficiency, defensive impact and, most importantly, team success. His ability to anchor both ends of the floor while leading his team to one of the best records in the conference gave voters a clear, well-rounded MVP case.

Doncic, on the other hand, carried a heavier offensive burden. His scoring title highlights just how much responsibility he shouldered, but that level of usage can sometimes work against players in MVP discussions, especially if it doesn’t translate to top-tier team results.

There’s also a stylistic difference that matters. Gilgeous-Alexander’s game is often viewed as controlled and efficient, while Doncic’s is more heliocentric, dominating the ball and creating nearly every offensive look. Both are effective, but voters have increasingly favored players who thrive within a structure that produces consistent winning.

In the end, the decision wasn’t about ignoring Doncic’s greatness, but prioritizing a different definition of value. Gilgeous-Alexander checked more of the modern MVP boxes, even if Doncic’s raw numbers were impossible to overlook.

Related stories

Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.

Tagged in:
Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

We recommend these for you in NCAA