NBA fans are stunned: Luka dominates scoring race, gets almost no MVP love
Despite leading the league in scoring, Luka Doncic was nearly absent from the top of MVP ballots, raising questions about how value is really judged.


There’s a long-standing belief around the NBA thaht if you lead the league in scoring, you’re almost guaranteed to be in the MVP conversation. This season, Luka Doncic put that idea to the test, and the results were surprising.
Doncic finished the year averaging a league-best 33.5 points per game, an elite mark that typically places a player easily in the MVP race. But when the votes were revealed, his name was barely near the top of the ballot.
He received no first-place votes and just one second-place vote, a disconnect that immediately stood out across the league.
Luka led the league in scoring (33.5 PPG), but didn’t receive any first-place votes and only got one second-place vote 😳 pic.twitter.com/5VpVkJJw2s
— Yahoo Sports (@YahooSports) May 18, 2026
Why Luka wasn’t in the MVP conversation despite league-led scoring
On paper, Doncic’s case seemed undeniable. Historically, players who dominate offensively at that level tend to command serious MVP consideration, especially when paired with playmaking and overall usage, areas where Doncic also thrives. But MVP voting has evolved.
It’s no longer just about who puts up the biggest numbers. Team success, efficiency, narrative momentum and even voter fatigue all play a role. In Doncic’s case, those factors may have worked against him despite his scoring dominance.
The team success factor
One of the biggest drivers of MVP voting is winning. Voters have consistently leaned toward players whose teams finish near the top of the standings. If a player’s team underperforms relative to expectations, or simply doesn’t separate themselves in a crowded conference, it can diminish even historic individual production.
While Doncic’s numbers were eye-popping, the overall perception of his team’s season likely didn’t match the typical profile of an MVP frontrunner.
Voter priorities are shifting
There’s also been a noticeable change in how voters define “value.” Efficiency metrics, two-way impact, and team context are now weighed more heavily than raw scoring totals. A 33.5 PPG season is still rare, but it doesn’t automatically outweigh contributions in defense, advanced analytics or team dominance.
A decade ago, leading the league in scoring might have been enough to secure multiple first-place votes. Today, it’s just one piece of a much larger evaluation.
Narrative matters more than ever
Fair or not, MVP voting is also driven by storylines. Breakout seasons, unexpected team success or players elevating franchises beyond projections often capture voter attention. Meanwhile, sustained excellence, especially from already established stars, can sometimes blend into the background.
Doncic may be a victim of that dynamic. When greatness becomes expected, it can lose some of its narrative impact, even when the numbers reach another level.
Luka vs. Shai: Why voters leaned the other way
The contrast becomes clearer when you look at the player who actually took home the award: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. While Doncic led the league in scoring, Gilgeous-Alexander delivered a more balanced profile that aligned with how MVP voters have been trending in recent years.
The 2025-26 @Kia NBA MVP... Shai Gilgeous-Alexander!
— NBA (@NBA) May 17, 2026
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had a year of firsts.
On Sunday, he made history with a second.
After a season that saw SGA place himself among the game’s all-time greats – or, in some cases, in a tier all by himself – the Thunder… pic.twitter.com/9ZL72uv3wf
Shai combined elite scoring of his own with strong efficiency, defensive impact and, most importantly, team success. His ability to anchor both ends of the floor while leading his team to one of the best records in the conference gave voters a clear, well-rounded MVP case.
Doncic, on the other hand, carried a heavier offensive burden. His scoring title highlights just how much responsibility he shouldered, but that level of usage can sometimes work against players in MVP discussions, especially if it doesn’t translate to top-tier team results.
There’s also a stylistic difference that matters. Gilgeous-Alexander’s game is often viewed as controlled and efficient, while Doncic’s is more heliocentric, dominating the ball and creating nearly every offensive look. Both are effective, but voters have increasingly favored players who thrive within a structure that produces consistent winning.
In the end, the decision wasn’t about ignoring Doncic’s greatness, but prioritizing a different definition of value. Gilgeous-Alexander checked more of the modern MVP boxes, even if Doncic’s raw numbers were impossible to overlook.
Related stories
Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.
And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.


Complete your personal details to comment