Why U.S. sports leagues will never adopt promotion and relegation

In most of the world, losing a season doesn’t just mean disappointment. It can mean dropping into a lower division, with financial and sporting consequences that reshape a team’s entire future.

Promotion and relegation, where teams move between divisions based on performance, is a defining feature of global soccer. It creates volatility, drama, and the possibility for even the smallest clubs to one day reach the top.

But in the United States, that system doesn’t exist. Instead, leagues like the NFL, NBA, and MLB operate as closed competitions. Teams are permanent members, so no matter how poorly they perform, they cannot be relegated.

And despite periodic debate, especially as soccer grows in the U.S., that fundamental structure is unlikely to change anytime soon.

Why the American system is different

The biggest barrier to promotion and relegation in the U.S. isn’t cultural. It’s financial. American sports leagues are built around franchise ownership. More than just competitors, teams are assets, often worth billions of dollars. Entry into leagues like Major League Soccer requires hefty expansion fees, and that investment comes with a guarantee of permanence. Relegation would undermine that model entirely.

As sports economist Stefan Szymanski explains, “relegation is a loss-making proposition and the owners will not vote for it.” No ownership group would willingly accept a system where a bad season could wipe out a significant portion of their franchise value.

Closed leagues also rely on mechanisms designed to maintain parity and protect investment:

• Draft systems that reward weaker teams with top talent
• Salary caps to control spending
• Revenue sharing agreements
• Centralized broadcast deals

Together, these mechanisms are designed to reduce volatility and protect long-term investment. In practice, they make failure survivable rather than consequential.

Historically, the U.S. moved toward this model over a century ago. While early baseball resembled a more open ecosystem, the rise of national media consolidated power into a single top league, leaving lower tiers as development systems rather than competitors.

What makes promotion and relegation so powerful elsewhere

In Europe and much of the soccer world, the system persists not because it is efficient, but because it is meaningful. Szymanski has argued that promotion and relegation embodies something deeper than competition: hope.

Even the smallest franchises operate with the theoretical possibility of climbing the pyramid. That dream, however unlikely, is central to fan identity. It’s why teams in lower divisions still draw passionate support and why the threat of relegation creates existential stakes at the bottom of the table.

From a business perspective (the perspective to which the U.S. is almost always giving preference), however, that same system creates instability. Clubs can lose massive revenue overnight. Some go bankrupt. Others enter cycles of boom and bust. In the U.S., leagues have deliberately avoided that volatility.

Do American fans even want it?

Among U.S. soccer fans, on the other hand, promotion and relegation has long been a popular idea, at least in theory. Supporters often argue it would increase competitiveness, reward ambition, and punish complacency. It also aligns with global soccer culture, which many American fans follow through European leagues.

But the general U.S. sports audience is less convinced. American fans are accustomed to parity-driven systems where even the worst teams have a pathway back to relevance through draft picks and roster building. The concept of a team being “sent down” permanently, or losing top-tier status, runs counter to decades of sports culture.

There’s also a practical concern. Relegation could remove major markets from top leagues, impacting TV ratings and sponsorships.

Justin Bailey, a youth soccer coach for an MLS academy in Dallas, said he believes promotion and relegation could only work in the U.S. once lower-league structures are more developed. He suggested that, if introduced at all, it would likely need to begin at a regional level due to travel and logistical challenges.

“Of course, money is the biggest factor for why promotion and relegation won’t happen,” Bailey said. “That money can’t buy a culture to allow it.”

He also pointed to differences in sporting culture, arguing that American fans are accustomed to short-term narratives and high-stakes finales rather than long-term league evolution. In his view, that expectation makes the idea of season-to-season movement between divisions difficult to sell to a mainstream U.S. audience.

A recent change in the NBA

Even so, recent developments suggest that closed leagues are beginning to reconsider how they manage incentives at the bottom of the table. While promotion and relegation remain absent from American sports, there has been a notable shift in the NBA recently. In May 2026, the league introduced stronger anti-tanking measures aimed at discouraging teams from intentionally performing poorly to improve their draft position.

These changes include adjustments to draft lottery odds and stricter policies designed to limit the resting of healthy star players in key games. In effect, the league is trying to reduce the strategic value of losing.

While this does not resemble promotion and relegation, it does represent a subtle but important evolution in the logic of closed leagues. For the first time, a major U.S. professional sports league is actively trying to reduce the competitive advantages of losing rather than simply accommodating them.

Could promotion/relegation ever happen in the U.S.? A small opening

For years, MLS commissioner Don Garber dismissed promotion and relegation outright. Recently, that stance has softened slightly, going from a firm “no” to a more cautious “never say never.” But any realistic change would require a fully developed lower-division ecosystem capable of sustaining top-tier economics. That infrastructure does not yet exist.

There is, however, a potential test case. The United Soccer League (USL) has plans to introduce promotion and relegation within its structure, alongside ambitions to launch a Division I league. If successful, it would mark the first time the system is implemented at scale in modern U.S. professional sports. Whether that experiment gains traction could determine if the concept ever expands beyond niche appeal.

Stability vs. risk

Promotion and relegation is one of the defining features of global soccer, but it runs counter to the core principles of American sports. In the U.S., leagues prioritize financial stability, competitive balance, and asset protection. In much of the rest of the world, soccer embraces uncertainty, even when it comes at a cost.

And that is the fundamental difference in why the system has never taken hold in American sports, and why it likely won’t anytime soon. Even as interest grows and experiments emerge, the gap between the two models remains not just structural, but philosophical.

Related stories

Premier League

'Oldest club’ controversy: Crystal Palace's disputed origin story

Premier League

Premier League promotion: Who's going up after Championship final day?

Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.