Kevin Garnett shows outdated mindset, mocks Wembanyama for crying

PSA: It’s 2026 - men are allowed to cry now!

Since it seems that not everyone got the message, here it is.

The contrast between 22-year-old breakout NBA star Victor Wembanyama’s perspective on that matter and 50-year-old former NBA champion Kevin Garnett’s is striking, but unsurprising.

Wembanyama has become known for getting emotional after big wins or tough games, and he’s received backlash for it before. And it looks like he’ll keep receiving backlash for it again.

When Wemby helped send the San Antonio Spurs to the 2026 NBA Finals, defeating the defending champions in a grueling seven-game series, he broke down in tears on the court, becoming one of the defining images of the playoffs.

It was a display of passion after an overwhelming and emotional ride. But Garnett didn’t see it that way.

“He’s crying in the motherf***g Western Conference Finals? That was too emotional for me,” the Hall of Famer said on his Ticket and the Truth podcast, arguing that Wembanyama still has “four more games to get” and shouldn’t be celebrating yet.

It’s not a surprising take coming from Garnett, whose career was built on intensity, edge, and emotional control channeled into aggression. But with that in mind, it begs the question of why crying is still treated differently than other forms of emotions in sports.

For clarity, according to Garnett, this is fine:

But this is not fine:

Not all emotions are treated equally

In professional sports, showing passionate emotions is usually celebrated. Players scream after big plays. They pound their chests. They talk trash. They play with visible anger and intensity and scream at each other on the sidelines or even at their coaches. All of that is framed as “passion”. But crying? That’s where we apparently draw the line.

Tears are still often seen as a sign of weakness, a loss of control, or proof that a player isn’t mentally tough enough for the moment. Garnett’s reaction fits squarely into the idea that composure, especially in high-stakes moments, is part of what separates champions.

The contradiction is obvious. Explosive anger is embraced. Joy is encouraged. But vulnerability, even in a historic moment, is questioned and criticized. Although Wemby has not yet won the championship, he’s proven over and over again that his emotions are not an issue. And yet...

The weight of expectation on male athletes

Part of this comes down to something bigger than basketball. Male athletes, especially at the professional level, are still expected to embody a very specific version of masculinity: controlled, stoic, and unshaken. Emotion is acceptable, but only within certain boundaries. And crying crosses that line.

Wembanyama himself has already pushed back on that idea. Earlier in these playoffs, after another emotional on-court moment, he addressed criticism directly.

“I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions,” he said, pointing to what he described as a fear of judgment and pressure to conform to “social codes.” He understands exactly how he’s being perceived, and has decided not to adjust.

Wembanyama has repeatedly shown emotion throughout the postseason, whether after comeback wins, series-clinching performances, or physically and mentally draining games. And each time, the reaction was followed by admiration from some and discomfort or criticism from others. The difference is that Wembanyama hasn’t changed. If anything, he’s leaned further into being unapologetically himself, something that stands in contrast to older-school expectations about how a superstar “should” behave.

Garnett represents a generation of players who equated emotional restraint with competitive focus. In that lens, celebrating or showing vulnerability before the job is finished can be seen as premature or even distracting. There’s also a legitimate basketball argument buried in his critique, that the Spurs, a young team, still have to reset quickly with the Finals ahead.

But the delivery, and the specific focus on crying, reveals something else. It’s not just about timing or focus. It’s about which emotions are considered acceptable.

The reality is that the culture around emotion in sports is changing. Younger athletes are more open, more expressive, and less willing to suppress parts of themselves to fit outdated expectations. Fans, too, are increasingly receptive to that authenticity.

Raw, human moments like Wembanyama’s resonate precisely because they break from the polished, controlled image athletes have long been expected to maintain. And yet, reactions like Garnett’s show that the old standards haven’t fully disappeared.

At its core, this isn’t just about Wembanyama or Garnett. It’s about how we define strength. If passion includes yelling, celebrating, and playing with fire, why doesn’t it also include the kind of emotion that comes from reaching a lifelong goal? Wembanyama didn’t cry because the moment was too big for him. He cried because it was powerful and important.

And whether that’s seen as a flaw or a strength says more about the expectations placed on athletes, and men, than it does about the player himself. Wemby shouldn’t need to win the championship to prove he can cry...but still, it would be poetic justice if he does.

Related stories

Spurs

Victor Wembanyama sends warning to Knicks with “relentless” confession

NBA Finals

NBA Finals 2026 odds: Spurs favored over Knicks despite historic run

Get closer to the game! Whether you like your soccer of the European variety or that on this side of the pond, our AS USA app has it all. Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more. Plus, stay updated on NFL, NBA and all other big sports stories as well as the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

And there’s more: check out our TikTok and Instagram reels for bite-sized visual takes on all the biggest soccer news and insights.